CREATE YOUR TOMORROW BE AN ENTREPRENEUR

“The most valuable assets of a 20th-century company were its production equipment.   The most valuable asset of a 21st-century institution, whether business or nonbusiness, will be its knowledge workers and their productivity.” PETER DRUCKER

30
Sep
2009

INDIA ON THE MOVE - BACK TO SCHOOL

by Elizabeth Haas Edersheim  September 2009
 

As the school year gets going and I have a chance to gather my thoughts from a trip to Asia, I wanted to share with you the incredible effort I saw in India around education reform focused on bringing post high-school graduates into the 21st century knowledge economy. It is quite a contrast to Bob Herbert’s comments on the status of the United States’ education reform, “In educating its citizens, we are now moving decidedly in the wrong direction"

 

Like the U.S., India faces a daunting education challenge—they need to make enormous improvements, immediately, in educating and training a very large and diverse population, with many of its people economically disadvantaged or living at a subsistence level. India has stepped up to the task, setting up a National Skill Council (NSC) to work with the Confederation of Indian Industry. They are rapidly innovating the entire concept of vocational and, in some sense management school, and revamping the country’s institutions, curriculum, and faculty.                  

 

India’s National Skill Council and the Confederation of Indian Industry believe that Polytechs—post-secondary vocational schools—are critical to the country’s future. By 2022, the government wants to train 500 million people to master a variety of skill—some entirely new—for the industries of tomorrow. Many of those people have only high school educations today.

 

They highlighted two primary challenges: (1) revamp a severely outdated curriculum and align it with the needs of industry, and (2) upgrade the faculty, ensuring that they have the knowledge to teach the skills of tomorrow and motivating them to continuously innovate.

 

Against these challenges, India is putting together two initiatives, both of them examples of the new Public-Private Partnerships.

 

Partnership 1 – The Indian government is moving the management of Polytechs to the private sector. Its rationale: industry knows exactly what they need, and knows how to manage a large institution. A radical change in governance is necessary to move forward.

 

The preliminary plan is that the private enterprise that takes charge of the contract will have no financial obligations but will need to make a number of commitments, including: 

  • Involve senior management directly in the curriculum and teaching; every member of the senior team must commit 1-1/2 to 2 hours a month to lecture in the classroom
  • Modify curriculums to better support their own needs of tomorrow
  • Offer their own employees the opportunity to become students during 2% of their working hours every year
  • Create tighter links between faculty and industry – e.g., offer faculty training opportunities inside the company

This private sector engagement and commitment is expected to fundamentally shift the dynamics of Polytech education to the needs of tomorrow.

 

Partnership 2 –The government also announced a program for setting up new Polytechs—not in rural areas but in industrial centers. The government will provide land and set up residence halls so students can be brought to the industrial center from the countryside to go to school. Multiple companies located in the area will be engaged in the Polytech—setting the curriculum, training their current and future employees, and building state-of-the-art facilities.

 

Will these two initiatives meet all the educational needs of every citizen of India? Of course not.  But they are bold efforts that will carry substantial educational and economic benefit to many, with the further benefit of fueling India’s burgeoning knowledge industries and boosting its international competitiveness. And they are going forward NOW.

 

We can all take a lesson from India. Washington and our local districts recognize the challenge. But are we just doing more of the same and not stepping back and asking what we need to do for tomorrow? Finding the solutions will require creativity and involvement of more than government. Our challenge—to be focused on what 21st century students and their future employers really need, and more cognizant of every person’s need for lifelong learning.

 

©Elizabeth Edersheim

 

Posted on 9/30/2009, 4 Comments
Tags:

Comments

Mr William Pounds

Liz,

I have long believed that two things have led to our very real educational problem.

1.  Recent and well deserved employment opportunities for women have drained our public schools of the talented teachers who in earlier times taught because they had limited access to other careers (for which they were well qualified).  We have not been able (or willing?) to make up for the loss.

2.  We have become a rich society where access to an easy life is assumed.  Few of the children of my friends study engineering or science.  Talented graduates of business schools/law schools  go into service jobs where the pay is good but where (in my opinion) their productivity is low.  Parental attitudes toward career choices contribute.  The recent unpleasantness may begin to change this but it will take time.

India has poverty on her side.

Bill
at 10/20/2009 1:26 PM
Warner Zipf at 10/28/2009 7:34 PM

Mr Frank Seldon

Liz,

I believe you may be on to a great topic here in opening a dialog about how to create effective public-private partnerships in Education.  Unlike India, though, the US’s issue is not with post-high school but with ELHI.

The good news is that a model solution is already available to us – the college / university system.  That system is a balanced mixture of public and private institutions, with a variety of programs / focus so any prospective attendee can find an option that fits their situation -- whether it be Harvard or Devry.  Private “trade” consortiums often set the standards by which these programs are judged, or even allowed to exist (ABA, AMA, etc)

Government plays a substantial role in this cooperative effort as well.  State and local governments fund institutions in their regions, offering their constituents lower cost, more accessible options.  Federal and State governments also provide both needs- and performance-based loans and scholarships, as well as grants/funding to both public and private institutions for research and other programs.

Private money also pours into many of these institutions.  Not only alumni, but also corporations contribute money to help fund programs they believe in.  Again, the government plays a role by offering tax breaks to support that funding.

Our post-high school system is far from perfect, but the plusses far outweigh the negatives.  In the context of public-private partnerships, it may well be the “shining star” that suggests opportunities may exist in other areas as well.

The challenge is to figure out how we take the learnings from that aspect of our education system and bring it to the ELHI system.  The last 30-40 years have been an abject failure for the US ELHI system.  Everyone shares in that failure – government, unions, parents, students, etc.  Pointing fingers and trying to identify villains will not solve the problem.  Throwing money at it is not the solution either, as has been evidenced over that same time period.

As you highlighted in one of your earlier blogs, the most successful interjections of government into the private sector have been in the form of creative destruction.  I believe it is time for government to use that same approach toward ELHI education – the monopoly needs to be broken.

What the future will hold beyond that will be a great topic for debate; the best way to find out is the same as what happened in the telecom industry – letting regional and local efforts try different approaches and see which succeed.  That will be the moment when all the insights gleaned on how to create successful public-private partnerships can be introduced and tested.  The transition period will no doubt be challenging – some efforts will fail – but it is hard to imagine it being worse than the current trends suggest.

Government’s greatest failure is that it entrenches interests in a current system and then gives those very interests large amounts of power over the future of that system.  Such is clearly the case in ELHI education, unfortunately making the likelihood of creative destruction very slim.  But we can dream, can’t we?

Frank

PS – hope all is doing great!!!
Warner Zipf at 10/28/2009 7:46 PM

Prof. Dr. Hermann Simon

Elizabeth,

good to hear from you. I am currently in Tokyo.

Some time ago I published a piece which compares India and China. Here it is:
[http://www.elizabethedersheim.com/Downloads/China-India_2009.pdf]

Prof. Dr. Hermann Simon
Chairman

SIMON - KUCHER & PARTNERS
Strategy & Marketing Consultants
Haydnstrasse 36
53115 Bonn
Germany

http://www.simon-kucher.com
Warner Zipf at 10/28/2009 7:52 PM

This article is also available from the Harvard Business Review

Warner Zipf at 10/28/2009 8:00 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Title


Body *


Attachments

Blog archive

Blog

Case Studies

Case-Based Evidence

Latest Discussions
Unable to display this Web Part. To troubleshoot the problem, open this Web page in a Windows SharePoint Services-compatible HTML editor such as Microsoft Office SharePoint Designer. If the problem persists, contact your Web server administrator.

Latest Cases
Unable to display this Web Part. To troubleshoot the problem, open this Web page in a Windows SharePoint Services-compatible HTML editor such as Microsoft Office SharePoint Designer. If the problem persists, contact your Web server administrator.